Voyager-Binance.US Legal Fight Must Be Resolved by April 13, Court Documents Say
Christy Goldsmith Romero
Commissioner
U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission
Explore the policy fallout from the 2022 market crash, the advance of CBDCs and more.
Christy Goldsmith Romero
Commissioner
U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission
Explore the policy fallout from the 2022 market crash, the advance of CBDCs and more.
Jack Schickler is a CoinDesk reporter focused on crypto regulations, based in Brussels, Belgium. He doesn’t own any crypto.
Christy Goldsmith Romero
Commissioner
U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission
Explore the policy fallout from the 2022 market crash, the advance of CBDCs and more.
Christy Goldsmith Romero
Commissioner
U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission
Explore the policy fallout from the 2022 market crash, the advance of CBDCs and more.
Voyager and its creditors stand to lose $100 million if legal objections brought by the U.S. government are not resolved by April 13, according to legal documents filed late Monday night.
The bankrupt crypto lender is taking urgent legal action to let a $1 billion purchase by Binance.US go ahead, fearful that ongoing quibbles over the contractual drafting could see the exchange pull out.
“Consummation of the plan by April 13 is necessary to preserve massive creditor value,” said a filing by Voyager’s creditors. “The evidence is uncontroverted that, if the deal is not completed, Voyager’s creditors will lose roughly $100 million in value.”
A parallel filing made by Voyager itself, also to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, said there would be a price tag of $10 million per month for any delay, and that over 1 million customers wouldn’t be able to access savings.
Under the terms of the deal, originally signed in December and approved by bankruptcy judge Michael Wiles in March, Binance.US can back out if the agreement isn’t closed within four months.
Lawyers for the U.S. government have protested that the detailed terms of the contract would effectively absolve the company from breaches of tax or securities law, and last week, District Judge Jennifer Rearden agreed to put the deal on hold while the issue is settled. In March, the Securities and Exchange Commission sought to argue that assets involved in the transfer such as the Voyager token VGX could constitute unregistered securities, but was rebuffed by Wiles.
Binance.US did not immediately respond to a request for comment from CoinDesk. On March 3, Binance’s Chief Executive Officer Changpeng Zhao tweeted to suggest he could pull out of the deal in view of legal delays, before adding that he still supported the deal to return funds to customers.
Edited by Sandali Handagama.
DISCLOSURE
Please note that our
privacy policy,
terms of use,
cookies,
and
do not sell my personal information
has been updated
.
The leader in news and information on cryptocurrency, digital assets and the future of money, CoinDesk is a media outlet that strives for the highest journalistic standards and abides by a
strict set of editorial policies.
CoinDesk is an independent operating subsidiary of
Digital Currency Group,
which invests in
cryptocurrencies
and blockchain
startups.
As part of their compensation, certain CoinDesk employees, including editorial employees, may receive exposure to DCG equity in the form of
stock appreciation rights,
which vest over a multi-year period. CoinDesk journalists are not allowed to purchase stock outright in DCG
.
Jack Schickler is a CoinDesk reporter focused on crypto regulations, based in Brussels, Belgium. He doesn’t own any crypto.
Learn more about Consensus 2023, CoinDesk’s longest-running and most influential event that brings together all sides of crypto, blockchain and Web3. Head to consensus.coindesk.com to register and buy your pass now.
Jack Schickler is a CoinDesk reporter focused on crypto regulations, based in Brussels, Belgium. He doesn’t own any crypto.