skip to Main Content
bitcoin
Bitcoin (BTC) $ 89,036.86 3.18%
ethereum
Ethereum (ETH) $ 3,283.55 0.70%
tether
Tether (USDT) $ 1.00 0.08%
solana
Solana (SOL) $ 214.13 1.77%
bnb
BNB (BNB) $ 629.92 0.71%
dogecoin
Dogecoin (DOGE) $ 0.384178 20.49%
xrp
XRP (XRP) $ 0.689698 15.46%
usd-coin
USDC (USDC) $ 0.999187 0.07%
staked-ether
Lido Staked Ether (STETH) $ 3,280.51 1.07%
cardano
Cardano (ADA) $ 0.577314 3.52%

Rise of Ethereum staking came at cost of higher centralization: JPMorgan

Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin previously admitted that centralization is one of Ethereum’s main challenges, which could take 20 years to solve.

113 Total views

1 Total shares

Rise of Ethereum staking came at cost of higher centralization: JPMorgan

The rise of Ethereum staking since major network upgrades, Merge and Shanghai, has come at the cost of higher centralization and lower staking yields, a new report by JPMorgan said.

JPMorgan’s analysts led by senior managing director Nikolaos Panigirtzoglou issued a new investor note on Oct. 5, warning about the risks stemming from Ethereum’s growing centralization.

Market share of top five liquid staking providers. Source: JPMorgan

Top five liquid staking providers — including Lido, Coinbase, Figment, Binance and Kraken — control more than 50% of staking on the Ethereum network, JPMorgan analysts noted in the report, adding that Lido alone accounts for almost one-third.

The analysts mentioned that the crypto community has seen the decentralized liquid staking platform Lido as a better alternative to centralized staking platforms, associated with centralized exchanges like Coinbase or Binance. However, in practice “even decentralized liquid staking platforms involve a high degree of centralization,” JPMorgan’s report said, adding that a single Lido node operator accounts for more than 7,000 validator sets, or 230,000 ETH.

These node operators get selected by Lido’s decentralized autonomous organization (DAO), which is controlled by few wallets addresses, “making Lido’s platform rather centralized in its decision making,” the analysts wrote. The report mentioned a case when Lido’s DAO rejected a proposal to cap the staking share at 22% of Ethereum’s overall staking to avoid centralization.

“Lido didn’t participate in the initiatives as its DAO rejected the proposal by an overwhelming majority of 99%,” JPMorgan analysts wrote, adding:

“Needless to say that centralization by any entity or protocol creates risks to the Ethereum network as a concentrated number of liquidity providers or node operators could act as a single point of failure or become targets for attacks or collude to create an oligopoly […]”

Apart from higher centralization, post-Merge Ethereum is also associated with an overall staking yield decline, JPMorgan noted. The standard block rewards declined from 4.3% before the Shanghai upgrade to 3.5% currently, the analysts wrote. The total staking yield has declined from 7.3% before the Shanghai upgrade to around 5.5% currently, the report added.

Related: Time to ‘pull the brakes’ on Ethereum and rotate back to Bitcoin: K33 report

JPMorgan analysts aren’t the only Ethereum observers that have noticed a significant increase in centralization of the network following the Merge upgrade. Executed on Sept. 15, 2022, the Merge has been seen as a major impediment to Ethereum’s decentralization and a major reason for dropping yields.

you are the yield pic.twitter.com/ONJT6QmDch

— Pledditor (@Pledditor) October 5, 2023

Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin has admitted that node centralization is one of Ethereum’s main challenges. In September 2023, he said that finding a perfect solution to handle this problem may take another 20 years.

Magazine: Blockchain detectives — Mt. Gox collapse saw birth of Chainalysis

Loading data ...
Comparison
View chart compare
View table compare
Back To Top