skip to Main Content
bitcoin
Bitcoin (BTC) $ 65,809.63 1.08%
ethereum
Ethereum (ETH) $ 2,697.57 2.55%
tether
Tether (USDT) $ 1.00 0.01%
bnb
BNB (BNB) $ 608.13 1.93%
solana
Solana (SOL) $ 157.80 1.56%
usd-coin
USDC (USDC) $ 1.00 0.00%
xrp
XRP (XRP) $ 0.589203 0.23%
staked-ether
Lido Staked Ether (STETH) $ 2,696.93 2.58%
dogecoin
Dogecoin (DOGE) $ 0.123728 4.47%
the-open-network
Toncoin (TON) $ 5.98 3.36%

‘IBC is a serious alternative for secure cross-chain communication,’ says Sunny Aggarwal of Osmosis

So far, Cosmos’ IBC seems to have stayed clear of troubled waters.

235 Total views

28 Total shares

'IBC is a serious alternative for secure cross-chain communication,' says Sunny Aggarwal of Osmosis

On August 2, the Nomad Token Bridge became yet another victim of cross-chain hacking after the protocol suffered a $190 million exploit. Joining a list of casualties alongside Axie Infinity’s Ronin Bridge and Solana’s Wormhole, many industry experts have cast doubt on the future of cross-chain technologies. However, not all cross-chain toolkits have thus far been exploited. Regarding this matter, Cointelegraph spoke with Osmosis’ co-founder Sunny Aggarwal. Osmosis is one of the most popular decentralized exchanges, or DEXs, on the Cosmos hub with $120 million in total value locked. Here’s what Aggarwal had to say regarding Cosmos’ namesake inter-blockchain communications protocol (IBC):

“The major bridge hacks are a reminder to victims that bridges are, in fact, too brittle to be allowed to custody significant amounts of capital at this stage in their lifecycle. High profile bridge hacks cast a light on IBC as being the most viable solution for cross-chain bridging as this understanding acts as an opportunity for the rest of the EVM-based ecosystems to look at IBC as a serious alternative to do cross-chain communication.”

Currently, there are nearly fifty blockchains using IBC to conduct 10 million+ transactions daily, across and ecosystem with $1 billion+ in assets under management, in spite of the market downturn. “The fully trustless nature of the system is what makes it [IBC] work so well,” said Aggarwal.

The DeFi architect then pointed to a recent example illustrating the resilience of IBC: “A huge test to the Osmosis DEX occurred when Terra Luna collapsed. The majority of our namesake OSMO tokens that was staked resided in LUNA/OSMO and UST/OSMO pools. In order to prevent a malicious actor from minting infinite LUNA and draining the pools of OSMO stake, Osmosis governance implemented a trading halt on the Osmosis-Terra IBC channels.”

According to Aggarwal, IBC’s capacity to distribute points of failure through inter-chain sovereignty is precisely what keeps it “the safest bridging protocol in existence.” Year to date, over $2 billion worth of funds have been stolen from cross-chain protocols, accounting for 69% of all crypto stolen in the period.

Loading data ...
Comparison
View chart compare
View table compare
Back To Top