skip to Main Content
bitcoin
Bitcoin (BTC) $ 95,770.66 1.59%
ethereum
Ethereum (ETH) $ 3,329.14 0.92%
tether
Tether (USDT) $ 1.00 0.17%
xrp
XRP (XRP) $ 2.25 0.18%
bnb
BNB (BNB) $ 657.31 0.72%
solana
Solana (SOL) $ 182.70 0.09%
dogecoin
Dogecoin (DOGE) $ 0.318905 0.74%
usd-coin
USDC (USDC) $ 1.00 0.18%
staked-ether
Lido Staked Ether (STETH) $ 3,323.29 0.87%
cardano
Cardano (ADA) $ 0.894552 1.04%

Grin network hit with 51% attack while GRIN token remains resilient

An unknown mining group currently controls more than half of the Grin blockchain’s hashing power.

486 Total views

12 Total shares

Grin network hit with 51% attack while GRIN token remains resilient

Grin, a privacy-focused cryptocurrency built on the Mimblewimble protocol, has just suffered a 51% attack on its blockchain.

According to a Nov. 7 tweet from crypto mining group 2Miners, an unknown group accumulated 57.4% of the total hash power of the Grin (GRIN) network on Saturday evening. 2Miners only had control of 19.1% of GRIN’s hash power, while sparkpool miners came in third at 18.9%.

— 2Miners (@pool2miners) November 8, 2020

Data from GrinScan shows the attackers were able to reorganize at least one forked block, at 23:17 UTC on Nov. 7. The unknown mining group has also increased its control since Saturday, commanding 58.1% of GRIN’s hash rate at the time of publication. 2Miners’ has risen to 24.6%, while sparkpool miners’ has dropped to 11.3%.

When a group of miners controls more than half of a network’s mining power, it can affect the organization of blocks, potentially causing volatility in the token price and disrupting confidence in the blockchain. However, a mining group having control of 51% or more of a network’s hash rate does not necessarily mean it has ill intentions — sparkpool has had up to 60% of the network’s hash power before and reportedly did not interrupt the production of new GRIN blocks.

The GRIN token remains relatively unchanged on the news, falling just 1.3% over a 24 hour period. 

The Ethereum Classic (ETC) blockchain suffered at least three 51% attacks in August, with attackers causing the reorganization of thousands of blocks. Unlike the ETC blockchain — which would cost attackers more than $7,000/hr to control more than half of the blockchain’s hash power — sustaining a 51% on the GRIN network only costs $75 at the time of publication, according to online resource Crypto51.

Loading data ...
Comparison
View chart compare
View table compare
Back To Top