skip to Main Content
bitcoin
Bitcoin (BTC) $ 97,383.09 1.99%
ethereum
Ethereum (ETH) $ 3,398.13 3.27%
tether
Tether (USDT) $ 1.00 0.00%
solana
Solana (SOL) $ 254.37 0.10%
bnb
BNB (BNB) $ 647.69 3.83%
xrp
XRP (XRP) $ 1.44 0.19%
dogecoin
Dogecoin (DOGE) $ 0.418977 4.54%
usd-coin
USDC (USDC) $ 0.999796 0.01%
cardano
Cardano (ADA) $ 1.04 6.19%
staked-ether
Lido Staked Ether (STETH) $ 3,395.13 3.19%

CFTC Charges Two Men Behind $44 Million Crypto Ponzi Scheme

The United States Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) has charged two U.S. residents and their entities for running a cryptocurrency investment scheme that defrauded over 170 investors.

CFTC Charges Two Men for $44M Crypto Scam

In an official press release, the CFTC alleged that the defendants, Sam Ikkurty and Ravishankar Avadhanam, had fraudulently solicited a total of $44 million from investors via several corporate entities under their control.

The regulator has also charged the defendants with operating an illegal commodity pool and failing to register as a Commodity Pool Operator with the CFTC.

According to the Commission’s complaint, the duo had promoted three so-called digital asset income funds – Ikkurty Capital, Rose City Income Fund, and Seneca Ventures – to investors. They’ve worked to lure in unsuspecting investors.

They started targeting investors in January 2021 through various channels such as an official website, a YouTube channel, and several other means. Some of the fraudulent claims were that the pooled funds would be used to invest in various digital assets, commodities, swaps, derivatives, and futures contracts, which would yield a high ROI annually. They were able to raise at least $44 million from around 170 investors.

The CFTC also alleged that rather than making any investment with funds from investors, they “misappropriated participant funds by distributing them to other participants, in a manner akin to a Ponzi scheme.”

Additionally, the Commission noted that Ikkurty and Avadhanam kept a portion of the funds for themselves and “other participants” and transferred the remaining to off-shore entities under their control.

“The defendants transferred some participant funds to other accounts under their control and for their benefit. The defendants also transferred millions of dollars to an off-shore entity that, in turn, may have transferred funds to a foreign cryptocurrency exchange. None of these funds were returned to the pool,” the complaint stated.

CFTC Seeks Restitution

A U.S. federal court has already issued an order to freeze the assets of the defendants, along with instructions to preserve documents relating to the scheme and the appointment of a temporary recipient of investor funds.

The CFTC is now seeking restitution and disgorgement of ill-gotten gains. It is also pushing for civil monetary penalties, permanent trading bans, and injunctions against future violations of the Commodity Exchange Act (CEA) and CFTC regulations.

Loading data ...
Comparison
View chart compare
View table compare
Back To Top